Is it really a dupe? Mac Painterly Paint Pot vs Maybelline Creme De Rose Color Tattoo

One of the most satisfying discoveries for a make up fan is a dupe; a product from a budget friendly line that is almost an exact replica of your favourite high end/luxury make up item. With that in mind, last year I decided to start a series here on the blog called “Is it really a dupe?” I can’t pretend to have discovered many (if any) dupes myself – all my knowledge on this subject comes from taking advice from other blogs, YouTube channels, magazines and friends! In this series I will be testing and comparing two products widely hailed as a luxury product and it’s more purse-friendly dupe. This time; ‘Mac Painterly Paint Pot’ vs ‘Maybelline Crème De Rose Color Tattoo.’

DSC00506E

DSC00507E

The Packaging

Mac Paint Pots come in the brand’s immediately recognisable chic and understated packaging and aesthetically I have no complaints. The Maybelline Color Tattoos appear to have been designed to emulate the Paint Pot packaging but with, in my opinion, a less sophisticated look. However, I find the Maybelline packaging much more practical; the lid is flat which makes it easier to store turned upside down so that you can see the shade without having to rummage, whereas the Paint Pot lids are domed meaning they have the tendency to roll around. You get 5g of product for your money with the Mac product and try as I might, I couldn’t find any reference to the weight of the Color Tattoo anywhere on the product, or online! Just gauging by eye though, it looks as though the Maybelline packaging might contain slightly less product, as the packaging is not as deep.

DSC00510EDSC00513EDSC00514E

The Product

The Mac Paint Pot in the shade Painterly (shown on the right in all photos) was the first product of its kind I owned. Mac describe them as a highly pigmented cream eye shadow and I’d say that is a pretty accurate description. Maybelline, however, describe the Color Tattoos as a gel-cream eye shadow but with finger dipped into both products if there is any difference in the texture, its almost impossible to tell. Crème De Rose is not an exact colour match for Painterly but pretty close as you can see. Even though Maybelline call this shade matte I would say it is not quite as matte as the Mac offering, which shows in both the pot and the hand swatch. Worn on their own I find both these products have the tendency to crease after a few hours, but to me these are best worn as a base for eye shadow given the neutral shades. For this reason, I have brushed some eye shadow over the hand swatches in the last photo and both products make the shade more vibrant than when worn without a base. In fact, if anything the Maybelline formula does a better job at this. That’s because once dry, the Color Tattoo has a more tacky feel to the Paint Pot. On the down side, this can mean shadow requires slightly more effort to blend than when worn over the Paint Pot. Both products make your eye shadows last all day. Maybelline claims to last 24 hours but I can’t verify that as I have never had make up on that long!

The Price

So far there has been barely any difference in the products but the price is where they do vary. The Paint Pots come in at £16 whereas the Color Tattoos will set you back around £4.99 and are often part of a 3 for 2 offer. Even if the Color Tattoo does contain less product, it’s hard to argue with that saving especially when the results are so similar. I love my Paint Pot but if I ever use it up and want to replace it with a similar shade, I’ll be happy to go for the cheaper alternative.

The Verdict

Is it a dupe? Good enough for me!

 

 

Previous ‘Is it really a dupe?’ posts…

Mac Candy Yum Yum vs Maybelline Fuchsia Flash

Advertisements

Is it really a dupe? Mac Candy Yum Yum vs Maybelline Colorsensational Fuchsia Flash

One of the most satisfying discoveries for a make up fan is a dupe; a product from a budget friendly line that is almost an exact replica of your favourite high end/luxury make up item. With that in mind, I have decided to start a series here on the blog called “Is it really a dupe?” I can’t pretend to have discovered many (if any) dupes myself – all my knowledge on this subject comes from taking advice from other blogs, YouTube channels, magazines and friends! So in this series I will be testing and comparing two products widely hailed as a luxury product and it’s more purse-friendly dupe. This time; Mac matte lipstick in ‘Candy Yum Yum’ vs Maybelline Colorsensational lipstick in ‘Fuchsia Flash’.

DSC00384e

The Packaging

Candy Yum Yum from Mac comes in the well recognisable and classic ‘little black bullet’ packaging. Well designed, easy to use and perfect for ‘flinging’ in your handbag. The only downside for me is that because most Mac lipsticks come in the same packaging you can’t identify which colour it is unless you look at the base, which can be a little irritating if you have a large collection. The packaging of Fuchsia Flash from Maybelline is completely different so clearly not designed to replicate the Mac packaging. I think you can tell it is a less expensive brand from the appearance but nevertheless I love the shape, colour and feel of the packaging. It also has a very satisfying ‘click’ on closure which means its nice and secure so that you don’t have to worry about it causing a mess when it finds it’s way to the bottom of your handbag!

DSC00386eDSC00388e

DSC00425e

The Product

In the bullet the colour of these two products is definitely a close match. If a bright and bold neon fuchsia colour on the lips is what you are after then you will love either product. Once swatched onto the back of the hand the main difference between the two products becomes apparent; the finish. The Mac lipstick (on the right in the photo) is completely matte whereas the Maybelline is more glossy. The colour still looks almost identical but can you really call this a dupe when the finish is so different? Once on the lips the difference in finish becomes even more obvious in my opinion (Mac is applied to the top lip in the photo) but again the colour is so similar. In terms of wear, the Mac formula doesn’t budge for hours even when eating and drinking. The Maybelline formula doesn’t hold up too badly, but definitely needs reapplying after a sip on a drink or a few mouthfuls of food. However, because it’s more glossy the formula feels more nourishing compared to the slightly drying feel of the matte Mac formula. Most people have a definite preference for either a matte or ‘non-matte’ formula and I think this difference in finish might be a deal breaker for those looking for a true Candy Yum Yum dupe.

The Price

I bought the Maybelline lipstick in Asda for just £5 during a special offer. I’ve seen it in Boots selling for £6.99, but you don’t have to wait long for Maybelline to be in a 3 for 2 promotion. The Mac lipstick sells for their standard price of £15.50 (unless you risk it on eBay) so clearly there is a big jump in price between the two products. I personally think both lipsticks are worth paying their respective prices for. Fuchsia Flash may not be an exact dupe due to the difference in finish, but I’m glad to have it in my collection as a glossier alternative to Candy Yum Yum. When worn together they also look fab!

The Verdict

Is it a dupe? Kind of.

If you have any requests for products you’d like me yo try out and compare, do comment and let me know…